Thursday, May 31, 2018

OSHA to Change Requirements for Crane Operators

OSHA recently announced a proposed rule to increase the safety of America’s construction sites. In addition to providing long-term clarity regarding crane operator certification requirements, the proposal reinstates the employer duty to ensure that a crane operator is qualified to safely operate equipment.
Under the proposed rule, a change to the categories of certifications for crane operators would ensure more operators are able to meet the requirement. The proposal discontinues a 2010 requirement, which never went into effect, that crane operator certification must include the crane lifting capacity for which the operator is certified. The proposal would expand the type of certification programs for crane operators.
Comments on the proposed rule may be submitted electronically or by facsimile or mail. See the Federal Register notice for submission details. Comments must be submitted by June 20, 2018.
OSHA recently published a final rule extending the operator certification compliance date until November 10, 2018, in order to provide the agency with additional time to complete this rulemaking to address stakeholder concerns related to the Cranes and Derricks in Construction standard.
Baton Rouge Hazardous Waste and DOT Hazardous Materials Training
Register for Hazardous Waste Management and DOT Hazardous Materials Training: The Complete Course in Baton Rouge, LA on June 5-7 and save $100 or receive an Amazon Fire HD 10 tablet with electronic versions of both handbooks. To take advantage of this offer, click here or call 800-537-2372.
Chattanooga Hazardous Waste and DOT Hazardous Materials Training
Register for Hazardous Waste Management and DOT Hazardous Materials Training: The Complete Course in Chattanooga, TN on June 12-14 and save $100 or receive an Amazon Fire HD 10 tablet with electronic versions of both handbooks. To take advantage of this offer, click here or call 800-537-2372.
Dayton Hazardous Waste and DOT Hazardous Materials Training
Register for Hazardous Waste Management and DOT Hazardous Materials Training: The Complete Course in Dayton, OH on June 26-28 and save $100 or receive an Amazon Fire HD 10 tablet with electronic versions of both handbooks. To take advantage of this offer, click here or call 800-537-2372.
$281,220 Proposed Penalties for Verla International After Fatal Fire
OSHA has cited New Windsor, NY-based Verla International, LTD and proposed fines of $281,220 for failing to protect its employees from dangerous chemicals, and other hazards.
In November 2017, OSHA investigated the cosmetics manufacturer after an employee was fatally injured in a fire. The company was cited for 11 violations for fall, and compressed air hazards, and for failing to ensure proper electrical grounding and bonding to prevent flammable vapors from igniting; properly dispose of flammable materials; develop and implement an emergency response plan; provide employees with first responder awareness level training; and record a workplace fatality in its OSHA 300 illness and injury log. 
“An employer’s adherence to safety and health standards, including the proper and safe transfer of flammable liquids, is critical to preventing fire, explosions, and other incidents that can seriously or fatally injure workers,” said OSHA Albany Area Office Director Robert Garvey, who also noted that OSHA cited the company in 2013 for similar violations.
Fatal Trench Collapse at Alabama Construction Site Incurs Multiple Penalties
OSHA has cited All Power Construction Corporation and staffing agency Labor Finders of Tennessee, Inc. after a temporary employee installing sewer lines suffered a fatal injury in a trench collapse. All Power Construction Corporation faces $139,684 in proposed penalties and Labor Finders of Tennessee Inc. faces the maximum allowed $12,934 in proposed penalties.
OSHA issued willful and serious citations to All Power Construction Corporation for allowing employees to work in a trench without cave-in protection, failing to provide a safe means to enter and exit the trench, and not having a competent person inspect the trench to identify potential hazards. OSHA cited the staffing agency for one serious violation for not ensuring that employees were trained on trenching and excavation hazards.
The investigation was part of OSHA’s National Emphasis Program on Trenching and Excavation.
“Employers are responsible for ensuring their worksites are free of recognized hazards,” said Ramona Morris, OSHA Birmingham Area Office Director. “This tragedy could have been prevented had the employer followed the necessary steps to ensure that protective systems were used.”
Draft Agenda for Respiratory Health Comment Period Extended
NIOSH has extended to July 13 the deadline for comments on its draft National Occupational Research Agenda for Respiratory Health, which the agency announced on March 15, 2018. Written comments were to be received by May 14.
In its notice of the extension, NIOSH said it was done "in response to a request from an interested party." Comments may be submitted electronically, identified by CDC-2018-0024 and Docket Number NIOSH-302, or by mail to: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, NIOSH Docket Office, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-34, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998.
What’s on OSHA’s Latest Regulatory Agenda
The Department of Labor’s Spring 2018 Regulatory Agenda includes 20 OSHA entries: 4 in the final rule stage, 7 in the proposed rule stage, and 9 in the prerule stage. Actions with significant implications for employers include the Standards Improvement Project IV (final rule stage); a deregulatory action under the Occupational Exposure to Beryllium standard (proposed rule stage); many revisions to the Cranes and Derricks in Construction standard (proposed rule stage): and revisions to the Emergency Response and Preparedness regulations (pre-rule stage).
Final rule stage:
  • Standards Improvement Project IV—final rule expected July 2018. This project is intended to remove or revise duplicative, unnecessary, and inconsistent safety and health standards. The revisions will address OSHA’s recordkeeping, general industry, maritime, and construction standards, with most of the revisions to the construction standards.
  • Respiratory Protection—final rule expected September 2018. Any person may submit to OSHA an application for approval of a new fit-test protocol; if the application meets certain criteria, OSHA will initiate a rulemaking proceeding to determine whether to list the new protocol as an approved fit-test protocol in appendix A of the standard. OSHA received a submission to consider three new quantitative fit-test protocols that reduce the time required to complete the fit test while maintaining acceptable test sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. This rulemaking evaluates the efficacy of the submitted fit-test protocols and, if appropriate, will adopt them in appendix A.

Proposed rule stage:
  • Occupational Exposure to Beryllium. OSHA says it has been negotiating with industry over the general industry standard and may propose revisions by December 2018.
  • Cranes and Derricks in Construction—proposal expected December 2018. Proposed amendments to OSHA’s 2010 standards include correcting references to power line voltage for direct current (DC) voltages as well as alternating current (AC) voltages; broadening the exclusion for forklifts carrying loads under the forks from “winch or hook” to a “winch and boom”; clarifying an exclusion for work activities by articulating cranes; clarifying the use of demarcated boundaries for work near power lines; and correcting an error permitting body belts to be used as a personal fall arrest system rather than a personal fall restraint system.
  • Crane Operator Qualification in Construction—this rulemaking seeks to identify criteria for employers to follow to ensure their crane operators are completely qualified to operate cranes safely on construction worksites.
  • Hazard Communication Standard (HCS)—proposal expected February 2019. OSHA and other US agencies have been involved in a long-term project to negotiate a globally harmonized approach to classifying chemical hazards and providing labels and safety data sheets (SDSs) for hazardous chemicals. The result is the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).  OSHA incorporated the GHS into its HCS in March 2012 to specify requirements for hazard classification and to standardize label components and information on SDSs. However, the GHS has been updated several times since OSHA’s rulemaking. OSHA wants to harmonize the HCS to the latest edition of the GHS and codify a number of enforcement policies that have been issued since the 2012 standard.
  • Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses—proposal expected July 2018. OSHA is seeking to amend its recordkeeping regulation to remove the requirement to electronically submit to OSHA information from the OSHA Form 300 (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses) and OSHA Form 301 (Injury and Illness Incident Report) for establishments with 250 or more employees, which are required to routinely keep injury and illness records. Under the proposed rule, these establishments would be required to electronically submit only information from the OSHA Form 300A (Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses).

Pre-rule stage:
  • Communication Tower Safety: Communication tower construction and maintenance activities are not adequately covered by current OSHA fall protection and personnel hoisting standards. OSHA plans to use information it will collect from a Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) panel to identify effective work practices and advances in engineering technology that would best address industry safety and health concerns.
  • Emergency Response and Preparedness: Some OSHA standards governing emergency response and preparedness were promulgated decades ago, and none were designed as comprehensive emergency response standards. OSHA is considering updating these standards with information gathered through a Request for Information (RFI) and public meetings.
  • Lockout/Tagout: Recent technological advancements that employ computer-based controls of hazardous energy (e.g., mechanical, electrical, pneumatic, chemical, and radiation) conflict with OSHA’s existing lockout/tagout standard. The agency has recently seen an increase in requests for variances for these devices. An RFI is planned to help understand the strengths and limitations of this new technology as well as potential hazards to workers.
  • Prevention of Workplace Violence in Health Care and Social Assistance: A December 2016 RFI solicited information primarily from healthcare employers, workers, and other subject matter experts on the impacts of violence, prevention strategies, and other information that will be useful to the Agency. On January 10, 2017, OSHA granted petitions from a broad coalition of labor unions and National Nurses United asking for a standard on preventing workplace violence in healthcare.
  • Blood Lead Level for Medical Removal: OSHA is exploring regulatory options to lower blood lead levels in affected workers. An advanced notice of proposed rulemaking would seek input from the public to help the agency identify possible areas of the lead standards for revision to improve protection of workers in industries and occupations where preventable exposure to lead continues to occur.

Training Lags for Non-native Workers in Small Construction Companies
Non-native workers in the United States employed in small construction companies received less safety and health training than non-native workers in larger companies, according to research by NIOSH and the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE). The research recently appeared in the journal Safety Science.
Construction is an industry with one of the highest work-related death rates in the country. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2015 almost one fifth of work-related deaths occurred among construction workers. Training is a critical part of workplace safety and health, both when beginning a new construction job and then continuing on an ongoing basis.
Many of the construction industry’s 10 million-plus employees work in small companies, defined here by NIOSH as those with fewer than 50 employees. Previous research by NIOSH and ASSE found that workers in small companies, as well as young workers (under the age of 25) and non-native workers, face an increased risk for work-related illness and injury when compared to other workers. What was not previously understood was how training practices compared between small and large companies, and between native and non-native workers.
Accordingly, NIOSH investigators analyzed the results of an ASSE survey asking construction companies of different sizes and worker populations about their training practices. Data collected from 268 construction business representatives suggest that non-native workers in small companies received fewer hours of training, both when joining the company and on a monthly basis, than non-native workers in companies with 50 or more employees. In fact, compared to non-native workers in larger companies, non-native workers in small companies were significantly less likely to receive every type of safety training surveyed. This training included pre-work and job-specific instruction, as well as training required by federal and state regulations and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration 10-hour training for construction. Furthermore, smaller companies were less likely to have supervisors on staff who speak the same language as non-English-speaking workers.
This research is important because it sheds light on the work-related safety and health training practices of small and large construction businesses. The findings highlight the need for work-related safety and health training specifically among non-native workers in smaller construction companies.
The online survey administered by ASSE to its members comprised 34 questions about on-the-job training in safety and health. In addition to asking about types and amount of training, the survey included questions about which workers receive occupational safety and health training, and how the company delivers and evaluates this training.
Work-Related Asthma Prevention Materials in Multiple Languages 
To reach workers who do not speak fluent English, California’s Work-Related Asthma Prevention Program created a series of fact sheets about how working around disinfectants, fragrances, and cleaning products may cause asthma. The fact sheets are now available in Spanish, Chinese, Tagalog, Vietnamese, and Korean.
Pennsylvania Manufacturer Earns Star Site Status
OSHA announced it has certified MI Windows and Doors' manufacturing facility in Gratz, Pennsylvania, as a Star work site. Star is OSHA’s highest level of VPP recognition for workplace health and safety excellence.
The company's certification into OSHA's Voluntary Protection Programs recognizes MI Windows and Doors' commitment to safety and health in the workplace. MI Windows and Doors, which produces new construction and replacement windows for businesses and homes, recorded an injury and illness rate 54% below the national average in the last three years.
"MI Windows and Doors has demonstrated a comprehensive and effective workplace safety and health program at its facility," said Michael Rivera, Acting OSHA Regional Administrator.
OSHA's VPP recognizes private industry and federal agency employers and employees that have implemented effective health and safety management systems and have maintained injury and illness rates below the national Bureau of Labor Statistics averages for their respective industries.
Safety News Links


Wednesday, May 30, 2018

What is a Substantially Identical Outfall for Stormwater Permits [40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)]

Federal EPA and state NPDES permitting authorities are authorized at 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7) to allow stormwater permit holders that have two or more outfalls with substantially identical effluents to test only one outfall, and report the quantitative data as applicable for the substantially identical outfalls. EPA’s guidance document titled, Industrial Stormwater Monitoring and Sampling Guide (EPA 832-B-09-003), provides information about how this monitoring exemption applies to industrial facilities where EPA is the NPDES permitting authority.
Facilities permitted under EPA’s 2015 Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity, are required to monitor all outfalls that receive stormwater discharges from their industrial activities. The exception to this rule under the 2015 MSGP provides permittees with the flexibility to monitor the discharge at one outfall and consider the results as representative for all substantially identical outfalls—with this exemption applicable for quarterly visual assessments and industry-specific benchmark monitoring requirements, but not effluent limitation guideline monitoring.
The 2015 MSGP defines substantially identical outfalls as two or more outfalls the permittee believes have discharges of substantially identical effluents based upon similarities that include:
  • General industrial activities and control measures,
  • Exposed materials that may significantly contribute pollutants to stormwater, and
  • Runoff coefficients of the drainage areas

The runoff coefficient is the ratio of excess runoff compared to the amount of precipitation for a given time over a given area. This value will range from 0.0 when there is no runoff potential, up to 1.0 if all the precipitation will run off. The value is increased due to impervious surfaces at a site such as buildings, pavement, or sidewalks and is decreased due to pervious surfaces such as grass or graveled areas.
Let’s consider the following scenario to determine if the facility is eligible for the substantially identical outfall exemption under the terms of the 2015 MSGP:
  • A metal recycling facility has a uniform scrap metal pile with three drainage ditches that direct discharge from three areas of the pile to three separate outfalls
  • Runoff from the scrap pile is managed using the same type of control measures in each drainage area

Based on this description, can the substantially identical outfall exemption be used for the three outfalls, or are there any differences in the conditions at the facility—compared to the exemption’s required components—which would prevent the facility’s operator from using the exemption?
The answer is yes, the facility’s operator can use the substantially identical outfall exemption for the three outfalls because all of the required components have been met as follows:
  • The industrial activities and the control measures being used are all the same,
  • It can be assumed the runoff flowing through the exposed areas does contribute the same type of pollutants to stormwater discharge, and
  • The drainage areas have the same or similar runoff coefficients

The 2015 MSGP requires that permittees who use the substantially identical outfall exception document their determinations in their stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) to include the following:
  • Location of each substantially identical outfall
  • General industrial activities conducted in the drainage area of each outfall
  • Control measures implemented in the drainage area of each outfall
  • Exposed materials located in the drainage area of each outfall that are likely to be significant contributors of pollutants to stormwater discharges
  • Estimate of the runoff coefficient of the drainage areas (low = under 40%, medium = 40–60%, high = above 65%)
  • Why the outfalls are expected to discharge substantially similar effluents

The 2015 MSGP specifies that permittees must perform the quarterly visual assessments for substantially identical outfalls on a rotating basis throughout the period of permit coverage. The permit also specifies that if stormwater contamination is identified in the visual assessment for a substantially identical outfall, permittees must assess and modify the control measures as appropriate for each substantially identical outfall represented by the monitored outfall.
If an event triggers a requirement for a corrective action that is associated with an outfall that has been identified as a substantially identical outfall, permittees must assess the need for corrective action for all related substantially identical outfalls. Any necessary changes to control measures that affect these other outfalls must also be made before the next storm event if possible, or as soon as practicable following that storm event. Any corrective actions must be conducted within the timeframes identified in the permit.
If your facility’s stormwater discharge is under the jurisdiction of a state SPDES permitting authority, you must determine if the state’s stormwater permitting program allows an exemption for substantially identical outfalls and comply with the terms and conditions of your state SPDES stormwater discharge permit that pertain to this exemption.
Learn more about how to effectively manage stormwater at Environmental Resource Center’s Stormwater Regulations – Webcast.
Highest Rated Environmental, Safety & Transportation Training
Environmental Resource Center has provided the highest quality environmental, safety, and transportation training for over 25 years. Our instructors bring a wide range of practical experience to the classroom, conducting seminars and live webcasts with expert knowledge, interactive exercises and a fun, relaxed atmosphere. Environmental Resource Center’s classes are available as public seminars, instructor-led webcasts, self-paced online courses, and as customized on-site sessions designed to meet your company’s individual needs.
To view a complete list of Environmental Resource Center’s top-rated courses, go to www.ercweb.com/courses.
Upcoming Seminars
Raleigh – RCRA, DOT, IATA and HAZWOPER Training – June 18-22, July 10-12, July 23-26
Special offers for Reg of the Day™ readers: Register for any of the classes listed above and you can take advantage of offers 1 and 2 or 1 and 3.
  1. Register two attendees at full price and each additional person attends the same class for half price.
  2. Save $100 off your registration when you register for both Hazardous Waste and DOT training in the same city.
  3. Register for both Hazardous Waste and DOT training in the same city and get an Amazon Fire HD 10 tablet with electronic versions of both handbooks. The Amazon Fire offer is only available by phone. Call 800-537-2372 and mention the Amazon Fire offer. Only one tablet per student per 12-month period. Students receiving tablets will not receive paper versions of our handbooks. Payment must be made prior to the date of the seminar. You will receive your tablet at the class. This offer can be combined with offer #1, but cannot be combined with offer #2 above, or any discounts, promotions, or refunds.

Eligible government organizations and agencies: Call Environmental Resource Center for GSA discounts.
Live Webcast Training You Can’t Afford to Miss
Environmental Resource Center’s live instructor-led webcast training is the best way to get the training you need—without leaving your office. Stay up-to-date with the latest regulations that can impact your facility and get your site-specific questions answered by our experienced, expert instructors. 
Webcast special offer:
  • Register two attendees at full price and each additional person attends the same class for half price.


Online Training – At Your Convenience
Learn when it’s convenient for you. Environmental Resource Center’s self-paced online training makes it easy to learn how to comply with the latest regulations that can impact your facility, and meet your training requirements in our no-sweat online courses:

Customized Training
All of Environmental Resource Center’s top-rated training can be customized for your site. Site-specific training is an efficient and economical way to train your employees, reducing time away from the job and travel costs.
Environmental Resource Center® will focus the scope of the training to meet your site-specific requirements, and deliver the training—at your site or as a live instructor-led or web-based session—whenever you need it.

For details or to request a quote for site-specific training, call 800-537-2372, email service@ercweb.com, or complete a training request form online.